PDA

View Full Version : S60Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

bugzy
03-22-2005, 02:00 PM
http://www.swedespeed.com/news/publish/Motorsport_News/article_500.html


http://www.swedespeed.com/gallery/albums//Motorsport/S60R%20Speed%20GT/2005/Sebring/013.jpg

http://www.swedespeed.com/gallery/generated//Motorsport/S60R%20Speed%20GT/2005/Sebring/017__scaled_600.jpg
stevehayes01
03-22-2005, 02:07 PM
Very nice! That is a hot car!
Alan_One
03-22-2005, 02:33 PM
Noice :tup:
paultakeda
03-22-2005, 02:36 PM
I like the S60, even the consumer version. That version? Great wide-body (that's what it is, right? I suck at kit identification) but that wing? GAWD.
bugzy
03-22-2005, 02:38 PM
I like the S60, even the consumer version. That version? Great wide-body (that's what it is, right? I suck at kit identification) but that wing? GAWD.
the wing is fine ... when its honest to gawd functional ;)
paultakeda
03-22-2005, 03:58 PM
Functional != pretty
bugzy
03-22-2005, 03:59 PM
i disagree ... functional can equal pretty ;)
Paul
03-22-2005, 04:15 PM
functional != ugly is what it is...

as they say, there are no ugly race cars
wikedgolf
03-22-2005, 04:19 PM
pretty doesnt = fast
engine + wing = faster
wing + body kit = show
paultakeda
03-22-2005, 04:46 PM
Functional != Pretty.

An object can be both, one, or neither, but they are distinct descriptors.

In this case, the object may be functional, but it isn't pretty.
bugzy
03-22-2005, 05:01 PM
your statement is true, functional != pretty

because they are not the same adjective, however, it doesnt mean they cant be both ;)
Tom (aka Godzilla)
03-22-2005, 07:51 PM
Much better looking that last years model......

http://www.mk2gti.com/images/ALMS_LS_04/2004_s60r.JPG
paultakeda
03-22-2005, 07:59 PM
your statement is true, functional != pretty

because they are not the same adjective, however, it doesnt mean they cant be both ;)

True. But I still think the wing is ugly.

I have absolutely no problem drooling over the rest of the car.
Doug242ti
03-23-2005, 07:30 PM
I agree with Godzilla. First thing I noticed was this year the car looks much more "finished" than before.

Trust me, Im SURE it is. Bell was saying at Laguna Seca that this years car were going to be all new shells.
Tom (aka Godzilla)
03-24-2005, 09:44 AM
I agree with Godzilla. First thing I noticed was this year the car looks much more "finished" than before.

Trust me, Im SURE it is. Bell was saying at Laguna Seca that this years car were going to be all new shells.
That's where I took that picture. :D
bugzy
03-24-2005, 09:47 AM
those look like racing BBS LM's
Damon
03-24-2005, 10:09 AM
Hotness
cballs
03-24-2005, 06:08 PM
sick ass Volvo